Snowflake or Databricks, which one should you choose for your big data and AI projects? We’re examining two of the most widely discussed data platforms. You’ve probably heard of them if you’re working on big data, analytics, AI, or machine learning.
So, Snowflake is great for data warehousing and SQL analytics, and Databricks is built for data science and machine learning.
But here’s the thing: how do you know which platform is the one? In this video, I’ll break down how Snowflake and Databricks compare, so that you can understand how they impact speed, cost, and overall results in your project.
Let’s start looking at four major areas: architecture, ecosystem integration, AI & ML capabilities, and pricing.
Snowflake runs on a multi-cluster shared data architecture. What that means is that it separates storage and compute, allowing you to scale them independently. You store your data once in a centralized storage layer, and multiple compute clusters can work on that same data at the same time without stepping on each other’s toes.
It is particularly useful if your workloads are constantly changing or you have multiple teams querying data simultaneously.
Now, Databricks is built on Lakehouse architecture. This means it combines the best of data lakes and data warehouses. You get the ability to store a lot of raw data like a data lake, and also the speed and performance of a data warehouse when you run queries on structured data. Behind the scenes, it uses Apache Spark, which makes Databricks great for handling big data, real-time data, and advanced analytics.
So, Snowflake is great for structured data and fast SQL queries, while Databricks is more optimized for raw data, complex models, and large-scale data pipelines.
Snowflake excels in its simplicity here. It integrates seamlessly with almost every BI tool available. If you’re part of a team that’s mainly focused on dashboards and analytics, you’ll probably appreciate how plug-and-play Snowflake feels. It’s built for SQL, so your analysts can start working with it right away.
Meanwhile, Databricks works well with developer tools and machine learning platforms. Plus, if you’re already using Azure or AWS, Databricks has solid support for both. It’s a favorite among engineers and data scientists who want to have full control over their data workflows and models.
Therefore, Snowflake is user-friendly for analytics and reporting, but Databricks is great for those doing coding and machine learning.
Databricks has the upper hand in this category. It was basically built for data science. You get built-in collaborative notebooks, version control, automated model training with MLflow, and access to libraries like TensorFlow, PyTorch, and XGBoost right from the start.
You can start with raw data and build a machine learning model in the same place. This means everything you need is in one environment.
Snowflake is still new to machine learning, but it’s developing quickly. It just introduced Snowpark, which helps you develop Python, Java, or Scala code right within Snowflake. It also integrates with tools like Amazon SageMaker and DataRobot.
However, it still prioritizes analytics and data preparation above deep learning and extensive testing.
So, in this round of Snowflake vs Databricks, if your project is heavy on AI/ML, Databricks probably wins. If your ML needs are lighter or more focused on SQL-based feature engineering, Snowflake will still do the job.
Snowflake’s pricing is usage-based, so you only pay for what you actually use. Compute and storage are billed separately, and compute automatically scales. That means if no one’s running queries, you’re not paying for idle compute. It’s a great fit for teams who want predictable billing and control over resources.
Databricks also offers pay-as-you-go pricing, but it’s based on Databricks Units, which can feel a bit harder to understand. Since it uses a lot of computing power, especially for Spark jobs and training models, the costs can go up fast if you don’t watch your jobs and clusters carefully.
That said, it gives you more control if you’re optimizing massive workloads.
Snowflake is most effective when you need a powerful and easy-to-use system to store and manage your data.
Let’s say you are running a company that collects tons of data from sales, marketing, and customer support systems. You want to run fast SQL queries to generate reports, dashboards, and business intelligence information. Your analysts are more comfortable writing SQL rather than coding in Python or Scala. In this scenario, Snowflake is the best platform to use.
Databricks, however, works really well when your data pipeline involves more than querying tables. It’s perfect for heavy data transformations, machine learning, and streaming.
For example, if you’re a fintech startup building a fraud detection system, you’d be handling real-time transaction data, doing complex feature engineering, and constantly training machine learning models.
Databricks would be the better choice here because it’s built on Apache Spark and will help you process massive datasets in parallel and run advanced analytics or AI workloads.
You’re writing code in notebooks using Python, Scala, or SQL. It lets you test ideas and turn them into real models all in the same place. Additionally, if you’re working with unstructured or semi-structured data, such as logs or JSON files, Databricks handles that complexity quite easily.
So, quick recap. Snowflake is great for structured data, fast SQL, and easy analytics.Databricks is the better pick for complex data, machine learning, and large-scale transformations.
Want to take the next step?
Visit ClickIT to connect with our certified data engineers and explore how we design and scale modern data platforms that support your business goals.
Thanks for watching, and we’ll see you in the next one!
Web application architecture is evolving rapidly, and in 2025, AI will play a more significant…
MCP architecture addresses one of the biggest limitations of generative AI. While generative AI excels…
I have been recruiting for tech for a while now, and to hire AI developers,…